Tuesday, 30 September 2014

As Hope dims for Nigeria...by Dele Momodu

Dele Momodu
Fellow Nigerians, please permit me to refresh our memories a little. The story I’m about to tell started some 21 odd years ago. A few of us were seated at the home of Nduka Obaigbena, Publisher of ThisDay, somewhere in Ikoyi, Lagos, working and planning what would later explode on the African continent as the most influential media conglomerate, Leaders & Company.

 I had the privilege of being invited by the Publisher, Nduka, to be the pioneer as well as coordinating Editor. We had very tall dreams and I was able to recruit some of the core staff. It was in the middle of this onerous task that a news item hit us like thunderbolt. Someone had passed privileged information to Mr Obaigbena from Abuja, the seat of power and glory in Nigeria. He has always had access to serious and uncommon scoops.

I saw from the expression on his face that something major had just happened. Nothing excites a journalist more than oven-fresh news. Reporters reach easy orgasms from getting the first access to monumental reports. The Publisher turned to me and said “Dele, your Dad, Abiola, has gone to Abuja to pick up the nomination form to contest Presidential election on SDP platform!” I was not totally surprised as I had long seen it coming. I had even written a passionate letter to Chief Moshood Abiola about two years earlier after General Ibrahim Babangida lifted the ban on some politicians including him. Only a fool would not have suspected that Abiola had been in the Presidential incubator for many years preparing for this extraordinary moment. I had pleaded with him to join the progressive party against all permutations. On a regular day, Abiola would have been expected to join the NRC, the baby of NPN and the father of today’s PDP.

My argument was pure and simple. One, Abiola should join the party of his people so that he would not antagonise his own folks. Two, it is not in the character of conservative parties to pick and present good Presidential candidates. It has never happened in our country and it may never happen. There was never a chance in hell that Abiola would have been nominated by NRC. Also, I had projected that if Abiola lost the final election, he should never lose the filial bond of his people. We knew he stood a great chance but in Nigeria, simple Arithmetic can simply turn into a most complicated Additional Maths.

The meat of this tale is that Abiola was able to pick his form effortlessly, from a party that paraded some of his fiercest critics and probably haters. The Chairman of SDP at the time, Ambassador Baba Gana Kingibe, also nursed Presidential ambitions. Alhaji Atiku Abubakar whose godfather, Major General Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, was a staunch and formidable member of SDP, also had his sight on the Presidential ticket of the Party.
A younger member of the party, Chief Reuben Famuyibo, also showed keen interest. There were several others with voluble ambitions. They were all able to express themselves freely in the true spirit of Democracy and as equal members of the same political fraternity. At the end of the day, after so much horse-trading, Abiola won and became the quintessential flag-bearer for SDP. The Chairman of the party, Kingibe did not resign or cross-carpet to the next party. Most of his supporters who were Governors did not abscond from the party. Yar’Adua did not threaten to pull out his massive weight of financial and human resources and donate it to NRC. Life was incredibly good in those days, as integrity rode supreme.

Abiola chose a theme that soon became the most popular mantra in Nigeria’s political history, “hope” by styling his campaign HOPE ’93. He had a clear and tangible manifesto, aptly titled FAREWELL TO POVERTY. His candidacy was believable and trustworthy. He did not rely only on his fabulous wealth or extensive fame; he connected to every citizen of Nigeria. He demonstrated his faith in Nigeria and carried every tribe, religion, gender and opinion along. He was of the opinion that a true President must believe in the totality of Nigeria with every fibre of his being. A tribal warrior and religious bigot had no moral basis upon which to run the Presidential race.
There was yet another lesson from this. Mr Obaigbena was a member of NRC who backed Chief Abiola’s opponent, Alhaji Bashir Tofa, while I supported Chief Abiola. We never clashed over politics though we worked in the same office. We met regularly, argued fiercely, but that was it. We all remained friends forever.

But times have changed. Internal Democracy has been sentenced to death. Tolerance has been nailed to the cross. A political party can solely dictate who becomes what without as much as a whimper from desperate old men and women and their even more desperate younger compatriots who are often too timid to protest. Politics as practised here has become monarchical where leaders are selected and coroneted rather than elected and inaugurated. We no longer have any principles and ideologies distinguishing one party from the other. It has even become very difficult to see leaders working for the betterment and general good of the people and society at large.

What we thought were problems confronting Nigeria in 1993 have turned out to be child’s play compared to what operates today. If Abiola used Hope as his slogan then, I wonder what he would use to capture the mood of this time. Executive recklessness has climbed to a record high. Legislative complacency has sunk to an all-time low. Judicial rascality has attained stupendous proportions. Media laxity has reached disgraceful magnitudes. Education has virtually collapsed. Insecurity has become the biggest headache. Infrastructural decay is mercilessly debilitating. We all seem to live in glorified ghettos. Power generation, transmission and distribution have never been so chaotic and it is a rare privilege to enjoy a few hours of uninterrupted power supplies.  These are abnormal times likened only to a subnormal existence of decadence, deprivation, denigration and decimation.
Yes, we’ve all heard these lamentations through the Ages but we can’t but continue to notice blood stains for as long as there are bed-bugs in the house. Our problems have defied solutions. How have we stopped talking? Many have asked me why I waste my time writing when nothing is likely to change. My response is always that Hope is the last thing to go before death. Nigeria will surely die the day we all give up. There is no question that most people see no light at the end of our dark tunnel. While it is hard not to share in their cynicism, we must carry on the struggle for a better and greater Nigeria.

I sincerely sympathise with whosoever heads this humongous project. If ill-prepared for the job, he may not even know where to start from. The challenges are too multi-dimensional and befuddling. But they are not impossible to tackle and conquer. The solutions are so visible to every eye and audible to all ears. What is lacking is the will and determination to change the way we all do things. There is nothing more difficult to change than change itself. I shall attempt a few postulations for whatever it is worth.
The first task for any serious and sincere leader is to work on the Psychology of Power. As soon as you get power in Nigeria, you become an instant demi-god. All the people who didn’t mind or care for your existence suddenly become your friends. These guys are power-mongers who understand how to manipulate an unwary leader to maximum advantage. When the leader himself starts to enjoy this process of vain-glorification he would naturally begin to live a very fake life. He is told by associates that it is his turn to enjoy power. His kinsmen inform him that it is also the opportunity for their tribe to feel the full effect of their great son whom it has pleased God to elevate. The leader is soon drowned in this cacophony of adulation and blatant idolisation. He forgets and is never reminded that his predecessors walked the same road and ultimately returned to relative obscurity because they built no lasting legacy. He is never told the repercussions suffered by his predecessors who were suffocated by the same supplicants. For a leader to survive and succeed, he must make a conscious effort to avoid the pitfalls of the past.  However, he can only do so if sees beyond the praise singers and charts his own course with dedication and discipline.

The second is The Allure of Power. Nothing glitters more than power. When a leader who has never enjoyed life suddenly finds his way to power, his priorities are usually those things he lacked from birth. This is why many African leaders fritter resources away on flights of fancy. They are the most travelled in the entire world. They carry the largest entourage of hangers-on who have no business whatsoever on those wasteful trips. The idea is to carry them around and show them the unequalled largesse that the person in power can confer on whosoever it pleases him to favour. Enjoyment becomes the first point agenda and the only transformation indeed that is pursued with all energy.

The third is the Greed of Power.  There are no saints anywhere but the level of greed is what has given our country a very big name in the comity of corrupt nations. Nothing is ever too small or big to pilfer. We steal in arrears and in advance. You hear stories of leaders making declarations of properties they are yet to acquire on their code of conduct forms.  Stealing has become a game or competition. And we don’t bother to hide our loot. As soon as a pauper gets to power and makes his first money, he runs back to the village to let his people see that he has arrived in grand style. His house must be bigger than that of the King and the monarch is obligated to going to pay homage to the new Lord of the Manor. The poor villagers are happy and grateful to receive whatever pittance is benevolently thrown their way. In the meantime, the clock of service is ticking away and the next election beckons with nothing tangible to show for the four wasted years. The only gain is that Master has serviced his own greed and is now dreaming of four more years. Even when they get it, nothing ever changes because by then they have fully adjusted to the life of graft and are enjoying it immensely.

Unless a leader can tame power, power will tame him. He must be strong and resolute and have a clear understanding of what is at stake and the powerful vision to deal with it. Nigeria is not impossible to govern but a leader who is desperate to retain power only for the sake of enjoying its appurtenances would not be able to offer the country the right impetus needed to galvanise its people to the zenith of glory. A true statesman would treat all citizens as one and do nothing to divide them. He would never use State power and paraphernalia of office to harass, intimidate and oppress opponents in order to maintain his monopoly of power.
He must genuinely seek the stability of his nation and do nothing to collapse its fabric of unity. He must pick a few projects and execute them to the highest standards. He must work speedily at rebuilding our collapsed institutions and this cannot be done if the leader surrounds himself with very shady characters who no morality in their bones. There must be a deliberate decision to do things right even at great personal risk at discomfort.

A leader who will save our country must be aware of his limitations and shortcomings and surround himself only with the brightest and the best.  Once the leader travels the path of enthroning mediocrity it is clear that something worse than mayhem will result. High court judges would be slapped black and blue. Party offices will be burnt. Hundreds of girls will vanish into thin air and life will go on as normal. Second-rate minds can never encourage excellence.  Instead they will resort to bringing up those even poorer than themselves in intellect, morality and diligence.  They do not want to be shown up for what they truly are or let those bright sparks steal their thunder.

Source: Thisday

As Hope dims for Nigeria...by Dele Momodu

Dele Momodu
Fellow Nigerians, please permit me to refresh our memories a little. The story I’m about to tell started some 21 odd years ago. A few of us were seated at the home of Nduka Obaigbena, Publisher of ThisDay, somewhere in Ikoyi, Lagos, working and planning what would later explode on the African continent as the most influential media conglomerate, Leaders & Company.

 I had the privilege of being invited by the Publisher, Nduka, to be the pioneer as well as coordinating Editor. We had very tall dreams and I was able to recruit some of the core staff. It was in the middle of this onerous task that a news item hit us like thunderbolt. Someone had passed privileged information to Mr Obaigbena from Abuja, the seat of power and glory in Nigeria. He has always had access to serious and uncommon scoops.

I saw from the expression on his face that something major had just happened. Nothing excites a journalist more than oven-fresh news. Reporters reach easy orgasms from getting the first access to monumental reports. The Publisher turned to me and said “Dele, your Dad, Abiola, has gone to Abuja to pick up the nomination form to contest Presidential election on SDP platform!” I was not totally surprised as I had long seen it coming. I had even written a passionate letter to Chief Moshood Abiola about two years earlier after General Ibrahim Babangida lifted the ban on some politicians including him. Only a fool would not have suspected that Abiola had been in the Presidential incubator for many years preparing for this extraordinary moment. I had pleaded with him to join the progressive party against all permutations. On a regular day, Abiola would have been expected to join the NRC, the baby of NPN and the father of today’s PDP.

My argument was pure and simple. One, Abiola should join the party of his people so that he would not antagonise his own folks. Two, it is not in the character of conservative parties to pick and present good Presidential candidates. It has never happened in our country and it may never happen. There was never a chance in hell that Abiola would have been nominated by NRC. Also, I had projected that if Abiola lost the final election, he should never lose the filial bond of his people. We knew he stood a great chance but in Nigeria, simple Arithmetic can simply turn into a most complicated Additional Maths.

The meat of this tale is that Abiola was able to pick his form effortlessly, from a party that paraded some of his fiercest critics and probably haters. The Chairman of SDP at the time, Ambassador Baba Gana Kingibe, also nursed Presidential ambitions. Alhaji Atiku Abubakar whose godfather, Major General Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, was a staunch and formidable member of SDP, also had his sight on the Presidential ticket of the Party.

Ekiti and the politics of the absurd..By NIYI AKINNASO

Ekiti kete should be in mourning over the repeated acts of partisan political brutalities in their otherwise apparently monolithic state. The state’s image as “the fountain of knowledge,” is fast giving way to a notorious one, namely, that of “the furnace of partisan political violence.” The notoriety of Ekiti politicians’ engagement in partisan politics dates back to 1983, when Ekiti was still part of the larger Ondo State from which it was separated in 1996.

It will be recalled that the late Chief Akin Omoboriowo, then the Deputy to Governor Adekunle Ajasin, defected from the Unity Party of Nigeria to the National Party of Nigeria in order to run against his boss in the 1983 governorship election. With the assistance of the central government and its institutions, which were controlled by the NPN, Omoboriowo sought to subvert the people’s mandate but failed. Although his ill-gotten victory was overturned by the court, the political violence following the declaration of rigged election results in his favour engendered a bloodbirth in which notable NPN politicians in the state were killed and their property destroyed.

Thuggery, electoral manipulations, and political violence have been central to Ekiti politics ever since. While Ondo State has been able to contain opposition politics since Ekiti was separated in 1996, it appears that the true colour of Ekiti politics has been on display, especially since the return to democracy in 1999. This was especially evident during the re-run governorship election in Ekiti State in April 2009 during which a number of prominent Ekiti citizens were killed. The display of brutalities which characterised the event now lives on forever in cyberspace and in people’s mind.

In my commentary on the event, (see Nigerian politicians, Ekiti, and the myth of Sisyphus, The Guardian, May 7, 2010), I likened Ekiti politicians to mythical Sisyphus, who was condemned to repeat forever the same meaningless task of pushing a rock up a mountain, only to see it roll down again.

Apparently, Ekiti politicians were not satisfied with a mere analogy. They chose to become Sisyphus in a rather bizarre way. They not only rolled the rock up the hill; they chose to roll down with it. In the process, one group decided to beat up as many judges as could obstruct their political path, while another group maimed and killed suspected leaders of the mayhem.

According to various reports, three shameful events followed one another in rapid succession. On Monday, September 22, 2014, some political thugs invaded the High Court No.6 in Ado-Ekiti to prevent Hon. Justice O.I.O. Ogunyemi from presiding over the determination of the eligibility of the Peoples Democratic Party candidate, Ayo Fayose. The judge had to be escorted out of his office by a detachment of police officers after he had been harassed and chased around his office by political thugs.

Again, on Thursday, September 25, 2014, another set of political thugs invaded the High Court premises in Ado-Ekiti assaulted Hon. Justice J.O. Adeyeye of the High Court No. 3 in Ado-Ekiti. Not only was he beaten up; his suit was reportedly torn into shreds. As judges, magistrates and other members of staff ran for safety, court property and records were damaged or destroyed.


A third event followed that evening, beginning with the cold-blooded assassination of a former Chairman of the National Union of Road Transport Workers, Omolafe Aderiye, followed by wanton destruction of property.

Governor-elect Ayo Fayose is suspected to be associated with the first two events because one of the judges is connected with the determination of his qualifications for the governorship election he overwhelmingly won, while the other has to do with the election tribunal adjudicating the petition against his election by the All Progressives Congress candidate, Governor Kayode Fayemi.

That’s why Fayemi is suspected to be behind Aderiye’s killing, because the latter is a staunch supporter of Fayose and the PDP. He is also believed to be a ringleader of the thugs involved in the assault on the judges and the destruction of the courts’ property and records.

Intensifying the suspicions is repeated posturing by Fayemi and Fayose, each denigrating the other in the process. Besides, neither has grown beyond the love-hate relationship between them, which grew out of political alliances and disagreements. Despite his brilliant concession speech, Fayemi’s doubts about Fayose’s victory deepened after the election. He also has made statements to the effect that the APC would get back Ekiti from the PDP. Similarly, many an Ekiti citizen and observers beyond the state never ceased to wonder why and how Fayose could be nominated as a candidate for the governorship in the first place, given the pending court cases involving him and the thuggery image associated with him. That’s why E-11, a socio-political group filed a suit, questioning his eligibility.

The anxiety on the part of Fayose and his supporters, who would like to see his election as settled, led to the disruption of all judicial processes associated with the election. The state must teach them a lesson by bringing them to book.

The critical question now is where do we go from here? But before we look forward, let us look back again. On the one hand, many have questioned PDP’s choice of a candidate as controversial as Fayose in Ekiti and Omisore in Osun. Honestly, I do not share such concerns, because neither of them has been convicted of a crime. Politics is about intrigues and manoeuvres. Both candidates were apparently so good at it that they won their party primaries. If INEC approved their candidacy according to its rules, so be it. I also have maintained that the election of Fayose by the Ekiti people is their problem.

On the other hand, APC’s petition against Fayose’s victory is unwarranted, given all we now know about Fayemi’s electoral problems and the lack of necessary and sufficient proofs of electoral malpractices that would upturn Fayose’s sweeping victory, which the Ekiti electorate celebrated rather than condemned.

This is not to excuse the behaviour of Fayose’s supporters or of Fayose’s poor leadership. His failure to control his band of thugs questions his governance style. True, Fayemi was smart in imposing a curfew, his action was too late. Besides, he too failed to caution his party’s thugs as he demonstrated time and time again during the election campaigns.

In order to bring the culprits to book and possibly avert similar problems in the future, many concerned citizens and groups, including the National Judicial Council and the Nigerian Bar Association, have called for arrests and investigations.

These are useful suggestions. However, I am of the view that the ultimate solution is in the hands of the good people of Ekiti, in line with the all-politics-is-local philosophy. It is high time Ekiti traditional rulers, religious leaders, business leaders, union leaders, professional experts, market women, artisans, and other stakeholders intervened. Otherwise, Ekiti will be perpetually condemned to rolling the rock of violence up the political hill, only to see it roll back to the bottom from where they would repeat the action.

Ekiti and the politics of the absurd..By NIYI AKINNASO

Ekiti kete should be in mourning over the repeated acts of partisan political brutalities in their otherwise apparently monolithic state. The state’s image as “the fountain of knowledge,” is fast giving way to a notorious one, namely, that of “the furnace of partisan political violence.” The notoriety of Ekiti politicians’ engagement in partisan politics dates back to 1983, when Ekiti was still part of the larger Ondo State from which it was separated in 1996.

It will be recalled that the late Chief Akin Omoboriowo, then the Deputy to Governor Adekunle Ajasin, defected from the Unity Party of Nigeria to the National Party of Nigeria in order to run against his boss in the 1983 governorship election. With the assistance of the central government and its institutions, which were controlled by the NPN, Omoboriowo sought to subvert the people’s mandate but failed. Although his ill-gotten victory was overturned by the court, the political violence following the declaration of rigged election results in his favour engendered a bloodbirth in which notable NPN politicians in the state were killed and their property destroyed.

Thuggery, electoral manipulations, and political violence have been central to Ekiti politics ever since. While Ondo State has been able to contain opposition politics since Ekiti was separated in 1996, it appears that the true colour of Ekiti politics has been on display, especially since the return to democracy in 1999. This was especially evident during the re-run governorship election in Ekiti State in April 2009 during which a number of prominent Ekiti citizens were killed. The display of brutalities which characterised the event now lives on forever in cyberspace and in people’s mind.

In my commentary on the event, (see Nigerian politicians, Ekiti, and the myth of Sisyphus, The Guardian, May 7, 2010), I likened Ekiti politicians to mythical Sisyphus, who was condemned to repeat forever the same meaningless task of pushing a rock up a mountain, only to see it roll down again.

Apparently, Ekiti politicians were not satisfied with a mere analogy. They chose to become Sisyphus in a rather bizarre way. They not only rolled the rock up the hill; they chose to roll down with it. In the process, one group decided to beat up as many judges as could obstruct their political path, while another group maimed and killed suspected leaders of the mayhem.

According to various reports, three shameful events followed one another in rapid succession. On Monday, September 22, 2014, some political thugs invaded the High Court No.6 in Ado-Ekiti to prevent Hon. Justice O.I.O. Ogunyemi from presiding over the determination of the eligibility of the Peoples Democratic Party candidate, Ayo Fayose. The judge had to be escorted out of his office by a detachment of police officers after he had been harassed and chased around his office by political thugs.

Again, on Thursday, September 25, 2014, another set of political thugs invaded the High Court premises in Ado-Ekiti assaulted Hon. Justice J.O. Adeyeye of the High Court No. 3 in Ado-Ekiti. Not only was he beaten up; his suit was reportedly torn into shreds. As judges, magistrates and other members of staff ran for safety, court property and records were damaged or destroyed.


APC in troubled waters as Buhari remains adamant, refuses to step down for younger candidates

Gen. Muhammadu Buhari
Former President, and one of the Presidential hopefuls under the platform of the All Progressives Congress, General Muhammadu Buhari has remained unyielding , despite pressure from different angles that he should give up the 2015 election in order to give younger people the opportunity to contest in an election the party has vowed to be ‘a do-or- die’ contest.

This decision has not only manifested in Buhari’s recent comment and consultations with party stalwarts, but has been displayed even at several gatherings of the party’s caucus where he showed no sign of a politician willing to listen to the advice of others as it concerns the 2015.
Recent events showed that the former Head of State is almost getting to the finish line of his presidential ambition, as he is now working to ensure that the October 8 formal declaration turns out successful.

Buhari who undoubtedly has cult followers and loyalists across the country, especially in the North-eastern part of the country will be making a 4th attempt to govern the country. His several attempts have however become his greatest undoing as some of the APC members are of the views that it will be regrettable if the party opt for Buhari as the daunting criticism has always been that he is advanced in age and as such cannot be supported by majority of the country’s youth.

Buhari has however not allowed those issues raised by most of his party members to bother him, as he believes he can rule the country at any age. This is apparently why he plans to address a collection of several youth support groups from various parts of Abuja today. Sources told DailyPost that the target of the Buhari group is to ensure that the youths are convinced that age does not really matter in governance and that those who are advanced in age and have gathered experience understand more the problems of the youth than those who are still within the youth circles.

With this development, the North appears to have been divided over Buhari’s candidacy as one of the groups working towards the realization of Kano State Governor, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso’s presidential bid, the Kwakwasiyya Forum, has continued to call on Buhari to rescind his decision to contest for the fourth time. The group has asked Buhari to leave power to the younger ones and continue to play advisory role in the polity. In their appeal to Buhari, they asked him to support a younger candidate like Kwankwaso.

The group had cautioned the APC to carefully handle the struggle that appears to be imminent among Buhari, Kwankwaso and Atiku Abubakar, asking the party to ensure that such struggle for power does not destroy the party.

Speaking to journalists in Abuja yesterday through its Edo State coordinator, Mr. Francis Ikonomwan, the pro-Kwankwaso group said it was working round the clock to reach out to the delegates and ensure that Kwankwaso emerges as APC’s presidential candidate for the highly coveted 2015 election.


“We want a paradigm shift; we want a change from the old order and this is why people are clamouring for a realistic change. We have looked at the track record and Kwankwaso is the man that actually meets the demands of the people.
“As for Alhaji Atiku, he has lost integrity, you may see people around him, they are hired crowds. Nigerians don’t want him. On General Buhari, he is a man we used to respect, he is a man Nigerians hold in high esteem, but we are surprised that he will be declaring Next week.

“Remember he told us after the 2011 elections that he will not contest again and we expect him to stick to his words as a man of integrity. If he contests again, that shows that he is no longer a man of integrity.

“I want to say that the ambitions of Atiku and General Buhari will tear APC apart. What is best for them is to come behind a younger person and no other person than Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso,” he said.

A source in the fold of the APC has told DailyPost that, the party is currently in one of its trying times, and coming out of the current turbulent time without harm may mean a massive victory for the party even in the 2015 contest against the PDP. He said ‘’ I think we are in for a big trouble, considering that we have not been able to reach consensus yet, but all the same, if we scale through this one, then consider PDP defeated, ‘’ a sources who pleaded not to be mentioned in print said.

Source: Dailypost

APC in troubled waters as Buhari remains adamant, refuses to step down for younger candidates

Gen. Muhammadu Buhari
Former President, and one of the Presidential hopefuls under the platform of the All Progressives Congress, General Muhammadu Buhari has remained unyielding , despite pressure from different angles that he should give up the 2015 election in order to give younger people the opportunity to contest in an election the party has vowed to be ‘a do-or- die’ contest.

This decision has not only manifested in Buhari’s recent comment and consultations with party stalwarts, but has been displayed even at several gatherings of the party’s caucus where he showed no sign of a politician willing to listen to the advice of others as it concerns the 2015.
Recent events showed that the former Head of State is almost getting to the finish line of his presidential ambition, as he is now working to ensure that the October 8 formal declaration turns out successful.

Buhari who undoubtedly has cult followers and loyalists across the country, especially in the North-eastern part of the country will be making a 4th attempt to govern the country. His several attempts have however become his greatest undoing as some of the APC members are of the views that it will be regrettable if the party opt for Buhari as the daunting criticism has always been that he is advanced in age and as such cannot be supported by majority of the country’s youth.

Buhari has however not allowed those issues raised by most of his party members to bother him, as he believes he can rule the country at any age. This is apparently why he plans to address a collection of several youth support groups from various parts of Abuja today. Sources told DailyPost that the target of the Buhari group is to ensure that the youths are convinced that age does not really matter in governance and that those who are advanced in age and have gathered experience understand more the problems of the youth than those who are still within the youth circles.

With this development, the North appears to have been divided over Buhari’s candidacy as one of the groups working towards the realization of Kano State Governor, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso’s presidential bid, the Kwakwasiyya Forum, has continued to call on Buhari to rescind his decision to contest for the fourth time. The group has asked Buhari to leave power to the younger ones and continue to play advisory role in the polity. In their appeal to Buhari, they asked him to support a younger candidate like Kwankwaso.

The group had cautioned the APC to carefully handle the struggle that appears to be imminent among Buhari, Kwankwaso and Atiku Abubakar, asking the party to ensure that such struggle for power does not destroy the party.

Speaking to journalists in Abuja yesterday through its Edo State coordinator, Mr. Francis Ikonomwan, the pro-Kwankwaso group said it was working round the clock to reach out to the delegates and ensure that Kwankwaso emerges as APC’s presidential candidate for the highly coveted 2015 election.


Monday, 29 September 2014

IBB, Abacha, Jonathan, others responsible for North problems –Sani

President of the Civil Rights Congress of Nigeria, Mallam Shehu Sani
The President, Civil Rights Congress of Nigeria, Mallam Shehu Sani, has said that 70 per cent of problems bedeviling the North are caused by ex-presidents and leaders of northern extraction.

The remaining 30 per cent, Sani said, should be attributed to President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration’s sectional leadership and neglect of the North. The CRCN boss described as a “waste” the number of years ex-heads of state and presidents of northern extraction had piloted the affairs of Nigeria.

He argued that they had not only failed to empower the region but ruined it educationally, socially as well as economically.

He said the past leaders such as Gen. Yakubu Gowon, Shehu Shagari, Generals Muhammadu Buhari, Ibrahim Babangida, the late Sani Abacha, Abdulsalami Abubakar, as well as the late Umaru Yar’Adua, all from the region only left behind trails of poverty, discords among the people of diverse faiths and ethnicity rather than development.

Sani, who is aspiring for the seat of the Kaduna Central Senatorial District on the platform of the All Progressives Congress, argued that President Jonathan only compounded the woes of the region while past leaders of the North simply left a region whose future was in doubt.

The activist said this while addressing sacked and unpaid workers of textile industries in the North who gathered on the premises of the Kaduna Textile Limited, in Kaduna State on Saturday.

He added that the President only empowered the people of the South-South on the detriment of other citizens of the country.

He said, “70 per cent of the North is destroyed by northern leaders and 30 per cent is being destroyed by Jonathan. We must take the blame and must tell ourselves the truth. Northern leaders had the opportunity to industrialise, to educate and to uplift the social standard of the region but they left behind a trail of poverty, of discord among people of diverse faiths and ethnic affinities.

“They left behind a region backward educationally and industrially. They left behind a region whose future is in doubt. For over three decades when northerners were in power they used the opportunity to empower traditional rulers and some religious leaders as well as making the rich, richer and pauperised the common man.


“They were not able to do what Jonathan is doing by empowering the young and the Niger Delta militants who are being enriched today. It was a wasted opportunity which I believe should serve as a lesson next time when power is back to the region.”

While condemning the insurgency in the North, Sani noted that the only way out of the current challenges in the region was for its leaders to embark on rapid revival of its industries, agricultural sector as well as to harness the resources of the region, rather than over-depending on federal allocations.

He said, “I must at this junction condemn the ongoing violence in northern part of the country. This act of terror and the discord between the Muslims and Christians and the backwardness of the region must stop.

“We are concern that the northern part of Nigeria is today becoming a theatre of violence and mindless killings. If there are functional industries, educational system and leadership, the North could not have been where it is today.”

Earlier in his address, the General Secretary of the Coalition of Closed and Unpaid Textile Workers Association, Kaduna State, Mr. Ishar Iorngulum, had said the workers had decided to queue behind the candidature of Sani to become the next senator representing the Kaduna Central Senatorial District at the National Assembly in 2015.

He also said that they would mobilize their colleagues in other parts of the North to vote against some leaders in the region in the 2015 general elections.

Iorngulum, “It is the irresponsibility of the northern governors that led to the collapse of the textile industries in the North so we will vote against them in 2015 elections.”

Source: Punch

IBB, Abacha, Jonathan, others responsible for North problems –Sani

President of the Civil Rights Congress of Nigeria, Mallam Shehu Sani
The President, Civil Rights Congress of Nigeria, Mallam Shehu Sani, has said that 70 per cent of problems bedeviling the North are caused by ex-presidents and leaders of northern extraction.

The remaining 30 per cent, Sani said, should be attributed to President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration’s sectional leadership and neglect of the North. The CRCN boss described as a “waste” the number of years ex-heads of state and presidents of northern extraction had piloted the affairs of Nigeria.

He argued that they had not only failed to empower the region but ruined it educationally, socially as well as economically.

He said the past leaders such as Gen. Yakubu Gowon, Shehu Shagari, Generals Muhammadu Buhari, Ibrahim Babangida, the late Sani Abacha, Abdulsalami Abubakar, as well as the late Umaru Yar’Adua, all from the region only left behind trails of poverty, discords among the people of diverse faiths and ethnicity rather than development.

Sani, who is aspiring for the seat of the Kaduna Central Senatorial District on the platform of the All Progressives Congress, argued that President Jonathan only compounded the woes of the region while past leaders of the North simply left a region whose future was in doubt.

The activist said this while addressing sacked and unpaid workers of textile industries in the North who gathered on the premises of the Kaduna Textile Limited, in Kaduna State on Saturday.

He added that the President only empowered the people of the South-South on the detriment of other citizens of the country.

He said, “70 per cent of the North is destroyed by northern leaders and 30 per cent is being destroyed by Jonathan. We must take the blame and must tell ourselves the truth. Northern leaders had the opportunity to industrialise, to educate and to uplift the social standard of the region but they left behind a trail of poverty, of discord among people of diverse faiths and ethnic affinities.

“They left behind a region backward educationally and industrially. They left behind a region whose future is in doubt. For over three decades when northerners were in power they used the opportunity to empower traditional rulers and some religious leaders as well as making the rich, richer and pauperised the common man.


Fayose; another ‘Idi Amin of Uganda’ – Femi Falana

Ayodele Fayose
Nigeria’s human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, has called on the acting Inspector-General of Police, Suleiman Abba, to “arrest and prosecute without any delay” those who invaded an Ado Ekiti High Court, beat up a Judge, and violated the Court of Justice.
Falana blamed the Ekiti state governor-elect, Ayodele Fayose for the sacrilege committed against the state judiciary.

In a statement released today, Falana said: “This is a reminder of the Idi Amin era in Uganda when judges were killed while discharging judicial functions,” he said.
“In my reaction to the outcome of the Ekiti state governorship election held on June 21, 2014 , I expressed the view that the Ekiti people had gone back to Egypt.

 The mayhem unleashed on a high court judge, lawyers and litigants in the precinct of the Ekiti State High Court sitting at Ado Ekiti on Monday, September, 23, 2014 by a gang of hired hoodlums has confirmed that the Ekiti people have fully returned to the wilderness.
“As the thugs were not brought to book they regrouped this morning and launched another attack on the High Court. In the process Justice Isaac Adeyeye was beaten up while the car of Mr. Rotimi Akeredolu, a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association was destroyed. Other judges and lawyers ran for dear lives.

“Thus, by desecrating the temple of Justice with the connivance of the Police the armed lumpen elements left no one in doubt that they have the full backing of the ruling party in executing the premeditated onslaught on the judiciary.

He noted that: “So far, those who perpetrated the barbaric attack and their sponsors have admitted their ignoble role through public statements issued by them. The Ekiti state governor-elect, Mr. Ayo Fayose has justified the shameful attack on the rule of law in Ekiti State by saying that his election cannot be challenged in court.
This is a reminder of the Idi Amin era in Uganda when judges were killed while discharging judicial functions. Mr. Fayose and his thugs should not be allowed to kill judges and lawyers before calling him to order.

“Since the Ekiti State police command is completely compromised the Acting Inspector-General of Police, Mr. Suleiman Abbah is called upon to ensure that all the assailants are arrested and prosecuted without any delay.
He then urged Ekiti people to ensure that the truth of the matter is uncovered. “Any attempt to cover up the brazen contempt of court should be resisted by the Attorney-General of Ekiti State, Mr. Wale Fapounda who should take decisive measures to bring the criminals to book.

Let no one politicize the criminality of those who are bent on replacing the rule of law with rule of force in Ekiti State. The Federal Government ought to distance itself from the shameless display of brute force by an in-coming governor Ekiti state.

“In view of the duty imposed on the Nigerian Bar Association to defend the rule of law and protect judges and lawyers the leadership of the Bar in Ekiti State and at the national level should mount pressure on the Police Authorities to fish out those who beat up a judge, chased judges and lawyers out of the Ekiti State High Court.

“Even under the defunct military junta judges were never subjected to physical assault over their decisions. Hence, in Garba v Federal Civil Service Commision (1998) 1 NWLR (PT 70) 449 it was held by the Supreme Court (per Eso J.S.C.) that:
“The military in coming to power is usually faced with the question as to whether to establish a rule of law or rule of force.

While the latter could be justifiable a rule of terror, once the path of law is chosen the mighty arm of government, the militia which is an embodiment of legislature and executive must in humility bow to the rule of law thus permitted to exist.
“The rule of law knows no fear, it is never cowed down, it can only be silenced. But once it is not silenced by the only arm that can silence it, it must be accepted in full confidence to be able to justify its existence,” his statement read.
Source: Pm News

Fayose; another ‘Idi Amin of Uganda’ – Femi Falana

Ayodele Fayose
Nigeria’s human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, has called on the acting Inspector-General of Police, Suleiman Abba, to “arrest and prosecute without any delay” those who invaded an Ado Ekiti High Court, beat up a Judge, and violated the Court of Justice.
Falana blamed the Ekiti state governor-elect, Ayodele Fayose for the sacrilege committed against the state judiciary.

In a statement released today, Falana said: “This is a reminder of the Idi Amin era in Uganda when judges were killed while discharging judicial functions,” he said.
“In my reaction to the outcome of the Ekiti state governorship election held on June 21, 2014 , I expressed the view that the Ekiti people had gone back to Egypt.

 The mayhem unleashed on a high court judge, lawyers and litigants in the precinct of the Ekiti State High Court sitting at Ado Ekiti on Monday, September, 23, 2014 by a gang of hired hoodlums has confirmed that the Ekiti people have fully returned to the wilderness.
“As the thugs were not brought to book they regrouped this morning and launched another attack on the High Court. In the process Justice Isaac Adeyeye was beaten up while the car of Mr. Rotimi Akeredolu, a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association was destroyed. Other judges and lawyers ran for dear lives.

“Thus, by desecrating the temple of Justice with the connivance of the Police the armed lumpen elements left no one in doubt that they have the full backing of the ruling party in executing the premeditated onslaught on the judiciary.

He noted that: “So far, those who perpetrated the barbaric attack and their sponsors have admitted their ignoble role through public statements issued by them. The Ekiti state governor-elect, Mr. Ayo Fayose has justified the shameful attack on the rule of law in Ekiti State by saying that his election cannot be challenged in court.

Friday, 26 September 2014

Tension in Ekiti, Fayemi declares curfew

Ekiti Governor, Dr. Kayode Fayemi, has declared a dusk till dawn curfew in the state. In a live broadcast in Ado-Ekiti on Friday, Fayemi said “there would be no movement between the hours of 7.00pm and 7.00am everyday till further notice.
“We urge the citizenry to be vigilant and provide the security agencies with details of suspicious activities that can undermine the peace in our state.”

The declaration followed widespread violence across the state capital on Friday aftermath the killing of a former Chairman of the National Union of Road Transport Workers, Omolafe Aderiye, by unknown gunmen on Thursday night.

Fayemi, who noted that the security agencies had taken control of the situation, urged them not to relent in performing their constitutional role of protecting lives and property in our state.

He said, “Administrations come and go; politics can be frenetic when the stakes are high; but by the grace of the Almighty God, our state remains for all time, therefore the peave of our land is not negotiable.”

The Governor appealed to the people to see themselves as brothers despite their political differences by embracing civility and empathy.

He said, “Let us deal truthfully with our youth, who are so liable to be led astray by unbridled political fervour, by seeing them as our children rather than as conscripts or fodder for our objectives.


“Let us work together to stop the violence and brigandage that has brought about serious embarrassment to our state in the last few days.”

Source: Punch

Tension in Ekiti, Fayemi declares curfew

Ekiti Governor, Dr. Kayode Fayemi, has declared a dusk till dawn curfew in the state. In a live broadcast in Ado-Ekiti on Friday, Fayemi said “there would be no movement between the hours of 7.00pm and 7.00am everyday till further notice.
“We urge the citizenry to be vigilant and provide the security agencies with details of suspicious activities that can undermine the peace in our state.”

The declaration followed widespread violence across the state capital on Friday aftermath the killing of a former Chairman of the National Union of Road Transport Workers, Omolafe Aderiye, by unknown gunmen on Thursday night.

Fayemi, who noted that the security agencies had taken control of the situation, urged them not to relent in performing their constitutional role of protecting lives and property in our state.

He said, “Administrations come and go; politics can be frenetic when the stakes are high; but by the grace of the Almighty God, our state remains for all time, therefore the peave of our land is not negotiable.”

The Governor appealed to the people to see themselves as brothers despite their political differences by embracing civility and empathy.

He said, “Let us deal truthfully with our youth, who are so liable to be led astray by unbridled political fervour, by seeing them as our children rather than as conscripts or fodder for our objectives.


$9.3m arms deal ridicules Nigeria worldwide —Fashola

Governor Babatunde Fashola 
Governor Babatunde Fashola of Lagos State, yesterday, said the alleged $9.3 million cash seized by the South African government has made the country a laughing stock worldwide.

Fashola also added that Abuja had not been consistent with information on the abducted Chibok girls and the attack on the Bama Community, saying; “Nigerians deserve to know the current state of the issues.”

Fashola made the remarks at the 2014 Gani Fawehinmi Memorial Colloquium held at the University of Lagos, Yaba, which also had in attendance, former governor of Lagos State, Admiral Ndubuisi Kanu, Professor Itsey Sagay and others.

Reacting to the alleged arms deal and what the late Gani Fawehinmi would have done if he was alive, Fashola lamented that the issue has made Nigerians mere laughing stock worldwide.
‘’And this happened because of the value choices that we have made. Let us stop pointing fingers at those people, you all voted for them. They are representatives of the values we have chosen to live with.

“Would Gani Fawehinmi have stood by and watch without demanding an explanation on how  money was spent. How N2 trillion was spent on oil subsidy without appropriation. Also, how will he have reacted to the stories of the disappearance of the $20 billion or $49 billion depending on what  you believe?”, he added.
The governor also lamented that the central government had not been consistent on sensitive issues concerning its citizens especially the abducted Chibok girls saga.

Commenting on the Nigerian Army’s claim that the abducted Chibok girls had been released and few hours after, back-tracked on the information it released earlier, Fashola said: “At one moment, the information was that the girls were not abducted. Later, we were told by the Federal Government that they now know where the girls are kept.”


“Few months later, the same government informed its citizens that the girls have been recovered. And in few minutes, they (Federal Government through the Nigerian Army) back-tracked on its earlier information.

“Over the last few days, similar incident occurred in Bama and the report from that place was that insurgents had taken over power. The media organisations who reported it were castigated. The reason was that they reported that Bama have been ceded. And few days later, there was another report that Bama have been recaptured. So if you recapture it and you said that you didn’t lose it.

“It shows that there is a problem; the right to know. We (Nigerian) must be updated on the progress and challenges on the issue.”

$9.3m arms deal ridicules Nigeria worldwide —Fashola

Governor Babatunde Fashola 
Governor Babatunde Fashola of Lagos State, yesterday, said the alleged $9.3 million cash seized by the South African government has made the country a laughing stock worldwide.

Fashola also added that Abuja had not been consistent with information on the abducted Chibok girls and the attack on the Bama Community, saying; “Nigerians deserve to know the current state of the issues.”

Fashola made the remarks at the 2014 Gani Fawehinmi Memorial Colloquium held at the University of Lagos, Yaba, which also had in attendance, former governor of Lagos State, Admiral Ndubuisi Kanu, Professor Itsey Sagay and others.

Reacting to the alleged arms deal and what the late Gani Fawehinmi would have done if he was alive, Fashola lamented that the issue has made Nigerians mere laughing stock worldwide.
‘’And this happened because of the value choices that we have made. Let us stop pointing fingers at those people, you all voted for them. They are representatives of the values we have chosen to live with.

“Would Gani Fawehinmi have stood by and watch without demanding an explanation on how  money was spent. How N2 trillion was spent on oil subsidy without appropriation. Also, how will he have reacted to the stories of the disappearance of the $20 billion or $49 billion depending on what  you believe?”, he added.
The governor also lamented that the central government had not been consistent on sensitive issues concerning its citizens especially the abducted Chibok girls saga.

Commenting on the Nigerian Army’s claim that the abducted Chibok girls had been released and few hours after, back-tracked on the information it released earlier, Fashola said: “At one moment, the information was that the girls were not abducted. Later, we were told by the Federal Government that they now know where the girls are kept.”


$9.3m seized in South Africa : What the law says, by Rep

The House Committee on Public Procurement, headed by Hon. Jumoke Okoya-Thomas, yesterday said the transfer of the $9.3 million arms deal contravened three major Acts of the National Assembly.
The Acts are Money Laundering Prohibition Act; Public Procurement Act (PPA) and Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Act.

Okoya- Thomas told reporters, said that it was not the the first time the executive had flouted the laws.
“Long before the $9.3m arms deal scandal broke, the House committees on Public Procurement, in conjunction with the Committee on Legislative Compliance, was given a mandate to investigate particulars of breaches of the Public Procurement Act 2007 by the President and make recommendations to the House.
“The joint committee recommended then that the House take appropriate action as is commensurate with the violation of an Act of the National Assembly.

“This new violation is even worse because it has portrayed us as fraudulent characters before the international community.”
Similarly, the Act which seeks to amend Firearms Act F28 LFN 2004, sponsored by Dakuku Peterside, also provides for stiffer penalties for illicit possession, transfer, manufacturing, dealing in and housing of firearms, small arms and light weapons and for other related matters, recommended a jail term of 25 years for perpetuators of such illicit act.

Section 27(1) states: “Any person who contravenes any of the provisions of this Act specified in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of this section is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction (2004 No. F28) while Section 17 of the principal Act which prohibits the importation or exportation of fire arms, small arms or light weapons or ammunition other than through prescribed ports.

Section 22 of the principal Act which prohibits manufacture, assembly or repair of firearms and ammunition, to a minimum sentence of 25 years” while Section 8 restricts the possession or control of ammunition in respect of certain firearms, small arms and light weapons.

Section 12 (3)(1) provides that “All houses, cars, vessels and properties used in the keeping, dealing in, transfer, manufacturing of illicit firearms, small and light weapons is compulsorily forfeited by the owners and acquired by the State.

Section 4(1) also provides that “All owners of houses, cars, vessels and properties used in dealing in firearms has the burden to prove lack of knowledge for harbouring, transferring or housing any fire arms.”
The Fire Arms Act (Amended bill 2013) empowers the Inspector- General of Police to establish and maintain a central firearms database both of the manufacturers of arms, dealers, importers of arms and all persons both as licence of fire arms in the country”.

“Section 2(1) of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act Cap 118 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004 provides that a transfer to or from a foreign country of funds or securities of a sum greater than $10,000 or its equivalent shall be reported to the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).
“Section 2(2) provides that such a report shall indicate the nature and amount of the transfer and the names and addresses of the sender and receiver of the funds or securities.

“Failure to report an international transfer of funds or securities as required under the Act is punishable with a minimum of 15 years imprisonment under section 15(2a) of the Act,” the Committee noted.
In a document obtained on the development, the procurement committee further noted that extant laws state that  “any person who conspires with aids, abets or counsels another person to commit the offence is guilty of the offence and liable to the same punishment prescribed for the offence under the Act.

On the allegation of money laundering, Section 5(1b) of the EFCC Act empowers the Commission to investigate financial crimes, such as money laundering, counterfeiting, contract scam, etc as well as investigate all reported cases of financial crimes with a view to identifying individuals, corporate bodies or groups involved.

“Section 6(2) empowers the Commission to enforce the provision of the money Laundering Act. Section 12(2) empowers the Commission to prosecute an offender under the Act.”
While noting that the transaction breached the Public Procurement Act, the Committee argued that the transaction was carried out in breach of the extant laws and the principle of accountability.

“Section 43(1a) of the Public Procurement Act empowers a procurement entity to carry out an emergency procurement where the country is either seriously threatened by or actually confronted with a disaster, catastrophe, war, insurrection or Act of God.
“In such situation, sub-section 2 of this section allows the procurement entity to engage in direct contracting of goods, works and services.

“However, sub-section 3 of this section requires such procurement to be handled along the principles of accountability.”
Okoya-Thomas said:  “In the present situation, the question could be asked: which organisation is the appropriate procuring entity? If the money was for purchase of arms, why was the transaction not carried out by the Nigerian Army or the Defence Headquarters?

“Why did they engage two Nigerian citizens and an Israeli to take physical cash to South Africa to buy arms and not follow due process?”
Source: The Nation

$9.3m seized in South Africa : What the law says, by Rep

The House Committee on Public Procurement, headed by Hon. Jumoke Okoya-Thomas, yesterday said the transfer of the $9.3 million arms deal contravened three major Acts of the National Assembly.
The Acts are Money Laundering Prohibition Act; Public Procurement Act (PPA) and Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Act.

Okoya- Thomas told reporters, said that it was not the the first time the executive had flouted the laws.
“Long before the $9.3m arms deal scandal broke, the House committees on Public Procurement, in conjunction with the Committee on Legislative Compliance, was given a mandate to investigate particulars of breaches of the Public Procurement Act 2007 by the President and make recommendations to the House.
“The joint committee recommended then that the House take appropriate action as is commensurate with the violation of an Act of the National Assembly.

“This new violation is even worse because it has portrayed us as fraudulent characters before the international community.”
Similarly, the Act which seeks to amend Firearms Act F28 LFN 2004, sponsored by Dakuku Peterside, also provides for stiffer penalties for illicit possession, transfer, manufacturing, dealing in and housing of firearms, small arms and light weapons and for other related matters, recommended a jail term of 25 years for perpetuators of such illicit act.

Section 27(1) states: “Any person who contravenes any of the provisions of this Act specified in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of this section is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction (2004 No. F28) while Section 17 of the principal Act which prohibits the importation or exportation of fire arms, small arms or light weapons or ammunition other than through prescribed ports.

Section 22 of the principal Act which prohibits manufacture, assembly or repair of firearms and ammunition, to a minimum sentence of 25 years” while Section 8 restricts the possession or control of ammunition in respect of certain firearms, small arms and light weapons.

Thursday, 25 September 2014

Don’t spill their blood - The Nation

It has almost become a recurring decimal in our national history. Every now and then, there are upheavals in our security agencies, particularly the military and to a large extent, the army.

During the military era, from 1966-1999, except for the brief interlude between 1979 and 1983, military uprisings in the form of coup d’états, were regular features of our political life in Nigeria as one group of military adventurers upstaged another in a rat race to control the levers of political power. In the political chess game, much blood was spilled.

After the military handed over to a democratically elected civilian government in 1999, the spectre of coups seems to have receded. However, what we are now contending with are some forms of insurrection now and again. In 2009, the nation had to grapple with the revolt by returning soldiers from Liberia, who took to the streets in Akure, the capital of Ondo State, southwest Nigeria, accusing some of their commanders of short-changing them.

During the subsequent trial, the soldiers alleged that many of them were arrested but some of them were let off the hook after paying $150 ‘ransom’ to a particular officer. They said the officer freed those who paid the bribe and refused to let go those of them who refused to cooperate. Besides, while the soldiers who protested injustice were jailed for life, the officers got away with light punishment, mostly demotion.

Now, almost the same scenario is playing out once again exactly five years after. In the current one, 12 soldiers have been sentenced to death by firing squad by a military tribunal. Their sentence was the climax of a military court martial involving the arraignment of 18 soldiers on a six-count charge for their involvement in a mutiny on May 14.

That day, some aggrieved troops opened fire at a car carrying Major-General Ahmadu Mohammed, the General Officer Commanding, GOC, 7 Division of the Army, based in Maiduguri, Borno State. The General Court Martial ended its sitting at the Mogadishu Barracks in Abuja last Monday. It sentenced 12 of the 18 soldiers to death by firing squad; one was sentenced to 28 days imprisonment with hard labour, while five others were set free.


The soldiers had claimed that they were ambushed while on a special operation in Kalabalge Local Government Area near Chibok in Borno State, where over 200 girls were abducted from the Government Secondary School, a month earlier. They alleged that, after the operation, the soldiers, who arrived the location at night, were asked to return to Maiduguri by their Commanding Officer despite their plea to be allowed to return the next morning, as the night trip was considered too risky. Unfortunately, halfway through their journey, they ran into a Boko Haram ambush, resulting in the death of more than 10 of them while others suffered various degrees of injuries.

This incident angered the soldiers, prompting them to rebel against their superiors while the GOC was shot at. The incident compelled the Nigerian Army to replace the GOC at the time. Alarmed by the development, the military authorities arrested the soldiers and instituted a military board of inquiry into the circumstances surrounding their conduct.

 The soldiers were slammed with six counts, including insubordinate behaviour, false accusation, mutiny, absence without leave (AWOL) and conduct prejudice to service discipline. The punishments for the offences under the Armed Forces Act (AFA) include death, imprisonment and dismissal with ignominy from the armed forces, among others.

Since last week when the death sentence was passed, the fate of the 12 soldiers has become a source of worry to so many Nigerians. Many have viewed the sentence as capable of impacting negatively on the ongoing campaign against the Boko Haram terrorists as well as demoralise the rank and file of the military.

They urged the military to put its house in order and fish out “all the Boko Haram apologists within its ranks and check the excesses of some security operatives who betray their oath of allegiance to the country through sabotage”, the type that led the soldiers’ revolt against their superiors. But some retired military officers have also insisted that the soldiers deserve to die in keeping with military discipline.

Well, it is good for the military to retain its long tradition of discipline. Any right-thinking person will also not hesitate to condemn the high temperament exhibited by the soldiers in response to the avoidable calamity which befell their colleagues due to needless “orders from above”. It is a pity that some of those now talking about discipline at all cost have also infringed on the law at one time or another and were spared the bullets.

However, the lesson from this episode is that the military should put its house in order so as to prevent this ugly thing from repeating itself. The issue of insider sabotage has become too pronounced in the military in recent times. The other day, some senior officers were court-martialled for selling weapons to the terrorists. This is a sad development for a military that wants people to take it seriously.

What this implies is the fact that there are Boko Haram members in the security forces, particularly the military, which is why it has been pretty difficult to neutralise the terrorists all this while. In most cases, the terrorists appear to be ahead of the military in terms of weaponry and intelligence gathering. This is probably why the soldiers have often taken to their heels when confronted by the terrorists.

There are rumours that some senior military officers who, before the Boko Haram crisis, were not that buoyant have now suddenly become rich overnight, with fat bank accounts, while the terrorists are daily making mincemeat of the innocent rank and file due to lack of adequate, up-to-date weapons.

Few weeks back, a contingent of about 480 Nigerian soldiers had to run into neighbouring Cameroun for sanctuary when they were almost routed by the ragtag Boko Haram terrorists. The Defence Headquarters had to downplay this shameful conduct by describing it as a “tactical manoeuvre”. Tell me, which tactical manoeuvre will make a large contingent of a country’s army to stray into another country, with most of them looking half-naked, dirty and weary?

In any case, this death sentence is like handing over a special commemorative trophy to the Boko Haram terrorists for a job well done in depleting the ranks of the country’s army as well as demystifying them through all forms of humiliation on the battlefield. Many a time, Nigerian troops complain about lack of adequate kits and equipment as well as inappropriate welfare to prosecute the campaign against Boko Haram.

Spilling the blood of these soldiers will only be the surest way to completely demoralise the rank and file of the Nigerian soldiers, who, as it is, are the ones bearing the brunt of this war. This is why they may be aggrieved and ready to explode at the slightest prompting.
This is the time for the federal government and the military leadership to look into the grievances of soldiers rather than dragging any of them to the stakes for execution.

 Prior to the incident which has now put the lives of at least 12 soldiers on the line, the soldiers at the Maimalari Cantonment had ceaselessly complained about insufficient ammunition, food and allowances. We cannot continue to lose our soldiers to official indiscretion, high-handedness and maltreatment by higher officers.

It is clear that if the GOC had exercised his discretion properly, the ambush that led to the death of some soldiers that night would have been avoided. In that case, the soldiers would not have had any cause to confront him, not to talk of firing at him or his car.

 There is no doubt that mutiny in the military is a grievous offence which should not be encouraged because of the security implication, but we have shed too much blood in this country unnecessarily, than to continue to railroad our young ones to their untimely graves. This is why the circumstance and facts of the mutiny should be taken into consideration.

Don’t spill their blood - The Nation

It has almost become a recurring decimal in our national history. Every now and then, there are upheavals in our security agencies, particularly the military and to a large extent, the army.

During the military era, from 1966-1999, except for the brief interlude between 1979 and 1983, military uprisings in the form of coup d’états, were regular features of our political life in Nigeria as one group of military adventurers upstaged another in a rat race to control the levers of political power. In the political chess game, much blood was spilled.

After the military handed over to a democratically elected civilian government in 1999, the spectre of coups seems to have receded. However, what we are now contending with are some forms of insurrection now and again. In 2009, the nation had to grapple with the revolt by returning soldiers from Liberia, who took to the streets in Akure, the capital of Ondo State, southwest Nigeria, accusing some of their commanders of short-changing them.

During the subsequent trial, the soldiers alleged that many of them were arrested but some of them were let off the hook after paying $150 ‘ransom’ to a particular officer. They said the officer freed those who paid the bribe and refused to let go those of them who refused to cooperate. Besides, while the soldiers who protested injustice were jailed for life, the officers got away with light punishment, mostly demotion.

Now, almost the same scenario is playing out once again exactly five years after. In the current one, 12 soldiers have been sentenced to death by firing squad by a military tribunal. Their sentence was the climax of a military court martial involving the arraignment of 18 soldiers on a six-count charge for their involvement in a mutiny on May 14.

That day, some aggrieved troops opened fire at a car carrying Major-General Ahmadu Mohammed, the General Officer Commanding, GOC, 7 Division of the Army, based in Maiduguri, Borno State. The General Court Martial ended its sitting at the Mogadishu Barracks in Abuja last Monday. It sentenced 12 of the 18 soldiers to death by firing squad; one was sentenced to 28 days imprisonment with hard labour, while five others were set free.


2015 Presidency: ATIKU declares ambition and promises to End Corruption

Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar on Wednesday promised to secure the future of Nigerian youths as he formally declared his intention to run for the presidency in 2015.
Atiku declared his presidential bid in Abuja with a promise to ensure “safe and secured lives’’ for the Nigerian youth.

“You, the youth, endowed with fresh ideas, bubbling energy and a passionate desire for change; you are the hope of this nation. Without you, we really can’t talk of a future with hope and confidence.
“That is why the 2015 election is about you. It is about how to ensure that you live safe and secured lives. It is about making sure that you feed well.

“Making sure you receive quality and affordable education and training, secure good jobs, support your own families and contribute positively to the development of our country.
“This is what a responsive and responsible government owes its citizens; this is what our generation owes upcoming generations,’’ he said.

He said APC’s adoption of the Modified Open Primaries in selecting its flag bearers would ensure that candidates who enjoyed the popular will of party members emerged.
He expressed hope in the future of Nigeria, saying “it is inspiring that amidst difficulties, and growing anxiety over the future of our country, our people have refused to succumb to despair and hopelessness.

“This never-say-die attitude gives me immense hope and it is one of the reasons why I can never give up on Nigeria.’’
Atiku chronicled his early life, foray into public service and experiences as the former number two man as platforms to better position him to serve the people.

“I was born in a southern Adamawa village to a nomadic trader and his wife who was a farmer. I grew up as a shepherd and farm boy and the only child.
“At 11, I lost my father. But with the help of my mother and relatives, I pulled out of the doldrums and faced the future with uncommon confidence.’’

He said that he built a “solid reputation as a diligent, hardworking, honest and innovative staff’’ during his 20 years in public service.
Atiku declared his presidential bid at the Yar’Adua Centre, flanked by party faithful, including past governors and serving members of the parliament.


Abubakar is the first presidential candidate to publicly declare his intention ahead of the February 2015 presidential polls.
Abubakar was elected Governor of Adamawa State in 1998 and while still Governor-Elect, he was selected by the PDP Presidential candidate, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, as his running mate.
The duo went on to win elections in February 1999, and Abubakar was sworn-in as Nigeria’s second democratically elected Vice President on May 29, 1999.

Source: Vanguard

2015 Presidency: ATIKU declares ambition and promises to End Corruption

Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar on Wednesday promised to secure the future of Nigerian youths as he formally declared his intention to run for the presidency in 2015.
Atiku declared his presidential bid in Abuja with a promise to ensure “safe and secured lives’’ for the Nigerian youth.

“You, the youth, endowed with fresh ideas, bubbling energy and a passionate desire for change; you are the hope of this nation. Without you, we really can’t talk of a future with hope and confidence.
“That is why the 2015 election is about you. It is about how to ensure that you live safe and secured lives. It is about making sure that you feed well.

“Making sure you receive quality and affordable education and training, secure good jobs, support your own families and contribute positively to the development of our country.
“This is what a responsive and responsible government owes its citizens; this is what our generation owes upcoming generations,’’ he said.

He said APC’s adoption of the Modified Open Primaries in selecting its flag bearers would ensure that candidates who enjoyed the popular will of party members emerged.
He expressed hope in the future of Nigeria, saying “it is inspiring that amidst difficulties, and growing anxiety over the future of our country, our people have refused to succumb to despair and hopelessness.

“This never-say-die attitude gives me immense hope and it is one of the reasons why I can never give up on Nigeria.’’
Atiku chronicled his early life, foray into public service and experiences as the former number two man as platforms to better position him to serve the people.

“I was born in a southern Adamawa village to a nomadic trader and his wife who was a farmer. I grew up as a shepherd and farm boy and the only child.
“At 11, I lost my father. But with the help of my mother and relatives, I pulled out of the doldrums and faced the future with uncommon confidence.’’

He said that he built a “solid reputation as a diligent, hardworking, honest and innovative staff’’ during his 20 years in public service.
Atiku declared his presidential bid at the Yar’Adua Centre, flanked by party faithful, including past governors and serving members of the parliament.


Friday, 19 September 2014

Atiku Criticizes Jonathan Endorsement By PDP

Atiku Abubakar
Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, believes that the People’s Democratic Party should have subjected President Goodluck Jonathan to a contest for the party’s ticket for the 2015 presidential election.

Abubakar explained that President Jonathan does not stand a chance against the All Progressives Congress, APC, because Nigerians now have a choice of which party to vote for at the 2015 general election.

Abubakar also informed Channels Television that some governors under the ruling PDP would join the APC in protest over the decision to make President Jonathan the sole presidential candidate of the party.

The Board of Trustees of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Wednesday night, resolved that President Goodluck Jonathan be the sole candidate of the party in the 2015 presidential election.

They said the resolution is born out of their conviction that President Goodluck Jonathan has done an excellent job in his first term and should be allowed to contest for a second term unopposed.

President Jonathan, who was elected into the office in 2011, was formerly the Vice President to late President Musa Yar’Adua.


Although he is yet to officially declare his ambition to run for a second term, thousands of supporters have been campaigning all over the country.

Source: Channelstv

Atiku Criticizes Jonathan Endorsement By PDP

Atiku Abubakar
Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, believes that the People’s Democratic Party should have subjected President Goodluck Jonathan to a contest for the party’s ticket for the 2015 presidential election.

Abubakar explained that President Jonathan does not stand a chance against the All Progressives Congress, APC, because Nigerians now have a choice of which party to vote for at the 2015 general election.

Abubakar also informed Channels Television that some governors under the ruling PDP would join the APC in protest over the decision to make President Jonathan the sole presidential candidate of the party.

The Board of Trustees of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Wednesday night, resolved that President Goodluck Jonathan be the sole candidate of the party in the 2015 presidential election.

They said the resolution is born out of their conviction that President Goodluck Jonathan has done an excellent job in his first term and should be allowed to contest for a second term unopposed.

President Jonathan, who was elected into the office in 2011, was formerly the Vice President to late President Musa Yar’Adua.


Oil Workers Strike: Nationwide darkness looms following cut in gas supply to power plants

Nigerians may soon experience nationwide blackout following the ongoing strike embarked upon by workers in the oil sector which has led to the disruption of gas supply to five power generating plants across the country.

The power generation affected by this cut off are the 1,320mega watts (mw) Egbin power plant, 750mw Olorunsogo, 868mw Geregu and the 220mw Sapele power plants as well as the 270mw AES Independent Power Plant.

The Minister of  power, Prof. Chinedu Nebo in a statement issued yesterday by his Special Assistant on Media, Kande Daniel, urged workers in the petroleum resources sector to call off their industrial action, stressing that the effect of the strike is severe on the power sector.

He noted that “the action taken by members of the Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG) and Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN) in the course of their ongoing strike have cut off gas supply to major power stations.”

The Minister rued the adverse effect of this development on power supply at a time government had made substantial progress in solving the gas problem, thereby, raising peak generation in recent weeks to an average of 4,500mw with a spinning reserve of about 300mw.

He decried the current setback arising from the oil and gas workers’ action, curtailing supply of gas-to-power stations, reducing power generation, and inevitably leading to a drastic reduction in power supply across the country.


Nebo, however, assured that efforts were on to ensure a speedy and amicable resolution of the matter, and appealed for the understanding of electricity consumers affected by the development. While appreciating the concerns and fears of the workers, he also urged members of NUPENG and PENGASSAN to take into consideration the enormous damaging socio-economic effect of their action on the nation, and return to work.

Source: Dailypost